|
Hello Russ, That is a specious argument. Beta is still used by professionals - VHS is mostly the home market (and I'm not certain the technical differences are so marked anyway). Your argument is just another in a long line defending average technology rather than doing things properly. That is doing serious harm to the IT industry. It is why the desktop moved to Windoze, why the enterprise is trying to move to NT, and "the world is moving to Ethernet". Ethernet has always been the preferred network for Unix systems but that is not what is driving the current popularity. It is small networks running Novell or Windoze and _that_ most definitely is driven by price first and foremost. These decisions are rarely made on technical merit -- often because the salesperson (or marketing/press coverage) leaves the non-technical purchaser with the distinct impression that "our cheaper product is just as good". We (as technologists) seem to be very good at suffering inferior technology and improving it over time rather than starting with a much better baseline and improving that. Think where we'd be if "the world" ran Power Mac's or OS/2 on the desktop, Lan Server for the NOS (over fibre-optic cable), and AS/400's as the enterprise repository, and all programs were written in SmallTalk. If we'd started moving this way 10 years ago, oh, what a wonderful place IT would be now! Just because "the world" is moving in some direction does not mean thinking professionals should jump on the lemming bandwagon -- it certainly is the easier route, though -- life in the wilderness is tough. Yes, you would need to replace hardware to move to faster TR but you'd need to do the same to move to faster Ethernet -- for example, when/if Gigabit Ethernet arrives. I would never recommed Ethernet as a first choice, even for small networks. Ethernet is cheaper for more reasons than simply "economies of scale". As I stated earlier it is cheaper to build an Ethernet card because the components are not as intelligent, therefore simpler, therefore cheaper. Also the licensing arrangements are easier on manufacturers, therefore easier for the "little guys". TR is more expensive than it _should_ be and that definitely is due to scale. The original author is already running TR network. You are suggesting they convert to Ethernet and I am suggesting they stay with TR -- they have already made the correct choice. I can't answer the original author's question because I don't know enough about his hardware. Regards, Simon Coulter. //---------------------------------------------------------- // FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists // Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 // Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 E-mail: shc@flybynight.com.au // // Windoze should not be open at Warp speed. //--- forwarded letter ------------------------------------------------------- > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 > Date: Sat, 02 Jan 99 10:56:19 -0500 > From: "rpopeil" <russ.popeil@ac.avnet.com> > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: RE: IBM 8230 Token-Ring concentrator > Importance: Normal > > HI Simon > > I do not dispute that Token ring is a better technology than Ethernet. But I > would compare this to VHS and Beta max we know who one, it was not the > technology leader. The world is going Ethernet, and Switched Routed 100mb > Ethernet with a properly designed network works fine even in large networks. > You mention 100mg Token Ring. To move up to this you will probably have to > replace your nic's and MAU's. While I will I agree that Token ring is a > better technology, I would still recommend Ethernet. As far as price, > Ethernet is less expensive due to economies of scale. There is just more > manufactures, more competition and more users that are keeping costs down. > Look at how much Ethernet equipment is sold by Cisco Bay and Cabletron not > to mention all the little guys vs Token-Ring. > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.