• Subject: Re: Question on Multiple Printers using One Outq
  • From: Chuck Lewis <CLEWIS@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 20:22:37 -0500

Thanks James !

This is a new system and I'm fairly new to this job. It just went "live" over 
the
holidays and I had sort of spaced checking system tuning, etc. with all of the
converions programs and data conversion  sutff and hardware deals... Duh...

Thanks !

Chuck

James W Kilgore wrote:

> Chuck,
>
> "load balancing" of printer pools has been around for quite some time. If you 
>are
> having a slow response (i.e. not printing at rated speed) you may want to 
>check into
> the memory allocation to QSPL or number of concurrent jobs. What's the print 
>job's
> priority?
>
> You may have enough available printer queues that the print jobs are 
>thrashing from
> inactive to ineligible instead of active to wait. A bump up on subsystem 
>memory or
> active jobs (if available) may resolve the resulting slowdown.
>
> The same would happen on a QINTER subsystem with 4 Mb and *NOMAX  loaded with 
>100
> users .... zowie! (can we say B10?)
>
> James W. Kilgore
> email@James-W-Kilgore.com
>
> Chuck Lewis wrote:
>
> > Thanks, I wasn't sure. I was playing around with it yesterday going to an 
>HP and
> > an impact printer and it seemed to be slow, I suspect both of these 
>printers and
> > will try some others.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > Scott Swaim wrote:
> >
> > > No I don't.  There is probably some degradation because the outq has to
> > > check to see which printer is available But for me this is not noticeable
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chuck Lewis <CLEWIS@IQUEST.NET>
> > > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
> > > Date: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 12:47 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Question on Multiple Printers using One Outq
> > >
> > > >Thanks Scott !
> > > >
> > > >Do you see any "degradation" in speed when an outq is "shared" between
> > > multiple
> > > >printers (i.e. do any of the multiple printers seem to "respond" more
> > > quickly in
> > > >"single" mode as opposed to multiple) ?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks !
> > > >
> > >
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.