| 
 | 
boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote:
>    The operations that set %EOF are:
>
>    - READ
>    - READC
>    - READE
>    - READP
>    - READPE
>    - WRITE (subfile only)
>
> So this is working as described - %EOF is not affected by
> successful CHAIN or SETLL operations.
FWIW, IMHO a chain really *can't* result in an EOF.  It *can* result in a
not-found, but not an EOF.  So design is correct.  I would feel the same about
the setll and/or setgt ops.
Reads returning an EOF yup.  Position to returning an EOF nope.  Pls don't 
change
that.
--
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. -- IBM Certified AS/400 Administrator
-- The sum of all human knowledge is a fixed constant.
    It's the population that keeps growing!
begin: vcard fn: R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. n: ;R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. adr: 991 Lucon Road;;;Schwenksville;PA;19473;USA email;internet: rbruceh@ibm.net title: Independant AS/400 Consultant tel;work: 610-222-9707 tel;fax: 610-222-9717 x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.