|
This has me talking to myself. I have a simple physical file with 300 records and 8 fields. It is non-keyed. There is a logical file over it with a non-unique key field of 6 digits. I can chain to the file and find the records I want. I can set lower limits and the file is set to the right place. But if I add in two Omit statements I can't get a successful chain, and setting lower limits sets the file at the lowest key in the file, not the lowest key that meets the criteria of the setll. The Omit statements omit the record if two other fields do not compare to the values in the dds. RUNQRY against the file selects correctly and orders the file correctly. So why can't I get a successful chain when the Omit statements are in place? -- ----------------------------------------------------------- boothm@ibm.net Booth Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.