|
Yes you can. Peer is Peer in both cases. You can even throw in an AS/400! Lucas Haag wrote: > > Does anyone know if you can do simple peer to peer networking with NT like > you can in 95/98 this is an important feature to me because I dont want to > have to buy NT $erver. > Thanks, > Lucas Haag > > At 02:30 PM 3/3/99 -0500, you wrote: > >Agree with James ! > > > >I'm running NT 4.0 on a Toshiba notebook (we did this about a year before > it had > >Toshiba's blessing...) > > > >DiskKeeper DEFINITELY makes a difference. I didn't set it up to run > automatically > >and whenever my machine starts to bog down I run it and the improvement IS > >noticeable ! > > > >Plug-n-Play has been called Plug-n-Pray by a number of us here too, for SOME > >time... > > > >My cohort was installing a PCMCIA modem card in his Toshiba (with NT 4.0) > and it > >crashed and started issuing OS/2 error messages and pointing to OS/2 code >!!! A > >bad drive turned out to be the problem. > > > >I would NEVER touch Win9x after NT !!! > > > >It DOES like memory, of course if you look at the box, Office 97 Pro has > FINALLY > >started owing up to what memory the apps "might" need !!! > > > >I am running 144MB of memory and things are GREAT !! > > > >Chuck > > > >James W Kilgore wrote: > > > >> Jeff, > >> > >> IMHO, NT is preferred, but there is a cost. > >> > >> Certain hardware will not work under NT. There is a hardware > >> compatibility list available on the net. This is a factor in the cost > >> of switching. Remember NT is OS/2 (with a new face). OS/2 is picky, > >> therefore NT is picky. > >> > >> For those that do not believe that NT is OS/2, check your directory. > >> You will find OS2.exe and you can read/write 2.88mb diskettes. Before > >> everyone gets their jets all fired up, NT does run under it's own kernel > >> but whenever an OS/2 function is required, it gracefully punts the the > >> OS that can actually do the job. > >> > >> The upside to 95/98 would be products like Cybermedia First Aid that > >> fixes a 95 Reg file. Not available under NT AFAIK. NT does not come > >> with a defrag, but search for Diskeeper Lite and you can find a low > >> priced add-on. > >> > >> NT can deal with multiple NIC's and IP address' if that matters to you. > >> Win 95/98 don't AFAIK. > >> > >> As far as 16 bit 95 applications like Word Perfect, load Win 95/98, load > >> Word Perfect, load NT over Win 95/98 and it will run. NT will not let > >> it install. You must have the disk FAT16. Now this is an old rule and > >> it may not apply for Win98 to NT but did for Win95 to NT. > >> > >> Now for you Roger: > >> > >> Roger Pence wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > Here are other drawbacks that quickly come to mind... > >> > > >> > 3. Iffy twinax connectivity. NT won't recognize many twinax cards (or any > >> > other hardware-dependent cards). > >> > >> I've found this to be true of 16bit ISA cards, especially with sound > >> cards that want to grab the available IRQ. Stealth cards may not create > >> this problem. Pulling sound cards and modems to get a twinax card to > >> work has become standard routine for us. > >> > >> > 4. No plug and play support (which, although maligned for Win9x has > saved me > >> > lots of time and grief) > >> > >> My brother-in-law is the data center admin for a local CC and he calls > >> it "plug and pray". ;-) > >> > >> > 5. Memory! Win9X reaches diminishing returns past 64MB, not NT. With > NT, get > >> > 128MB! > >> > >> True, for some reason you will actually degrade a Win95 box if you have > >> more than 64k. For NT, the more the better. OS/2 will run is 32mb a > >> whole lot better than NT. IMHO, 64k for NT is a start point. > >> > >> > 6. No disk defrag included--get one and use it > >> > >> I've used Diskeeper Lite and to tell you the truth, it runs defrag every > >> month so I can't tell if I've had an improvement because I've never had > >> a slowdown. But I feel better knowing it's been done. Now this is on > >> the workstation, not the server. On the server side, if it fragments > >> enough that you can actually measure the response and run a trial > >> Diskeeper and actually measure the improvement it may be beneficial > >> beyond personal satisfaction of having run a useless MS required task > >> that no other OS requires. > >> > >> > 7. Spotty app compability. Generally apps work across platforms, but > >> > sometimes there is still a stickler. Lotus ScreenCam was my latest >headache > >> > (Adobe Type Manager before that) > >> > >> Curious, are these 16bit apps? Haven't used either myself. > >> > >> > 8. OS cost. For one workstation, the upgrade isn't a big deal. For lots, > >> > though, bring your fat checkbook. > >> > >> Now Roger, don't quibble about acquisition cost vs cost of ownership. > >> Isn't that the popular arguement of an AS/400 over an NT box? ;-) But > >> let's face it, it's easier to tell a committee that it's only $200 each > >> vs saying it's $20k, one time, for all of them. > >> > > >> > One other thought, MS has backed off its NT-on-the-desktop strategy. >There > >> > is a wave of discontent building for very fat desktops and MS has seen >the > >> > light. Don't be bullied into thinking Win9X goes away anytime soon). > >> > > >> > Having said all that, if you can live within its constraints, I agree >with > >> > Bob that NT is the way to go. > >> > >> I believe that MS has made it clear that 95/98 is a consumer product and > >> NT is a commercial product. IMHO, pick accordingly. > >> > >> James W. Kilgore > >> email@James-W-Kilgore.com > >> +--- > >> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > >> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > >> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > >> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to >MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > >> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: >david@midrange.com > >> +--- > > > >+--- > >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > >| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > >| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > >+--- > > > > > ************************************************ > Lucas Haag > HCR 66 Box 25A > Bartley, Nebraska 69020-9717 > Email: lhaag@csb.swnebr.net > World Wide Web: http://www.swnebr.net/~lhaag > KC0BJB, Amateur Radio Tecnician Class License > ****************************************************** > ----- ---- NEBRASKA CORNHUSKER FOOTBALL > --- -- NATIONAL CHAMPIONS > -- -- -- 1970 > -- -- -- 1971 > -- -- -- 1994 GO BIG RED!! > -- -- -- 1995 > -- -- -- 1997 > ---- ----- > ****************************************************** > > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
