|
John, Realistically level 10 is a pain in the *** anyway. You end up with every spelling of QSECOFR as a user profile and every fat fingered grouping of characters imaginable as well. And anyway IBM is probably looking at potential liability. Someone is bound to go after them claiming that 'you gave me level 10 and I used it and I lost my data so it's your fault' Sure you can lose data at level 50 almost as easy but at least then security is implemented incorrectly and not just 'turned off'. - Larry John Earl wrote: > > Larry, > > At COMMON Carol Woodbury said that QSECURITY level 10 is supported if you are > _currently_ at that level. Once you change from 10 to anything else, you're >not allowed > to go back to 10. That's bound to be a rude surprise for some people, but I >like it!!! > > jte > -- Larry Bolhuis | Arbor Solutions, Inc | Two rules to success in life: (616) 451-2500 | 1. Never tell people everything you know. lbolhui@ibm.net | +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.