dennis.e.lovelady@ac.com wrote:

>How about just a *leetle* shorter....
>
>Create the command, C, with default parameters which specify a and b (in
>the solution below), and you have:
>
>C

I'd thought of that, but if I had to code the command, its source would
really have been part of the program. I think I can get away with the 2
CRTDUPOBJs because there's no source coding involved in creating the
objects. If Roger disallows even them (as he might) I'll have to fall back
on:

cpyf a *print

If Roger allows your single C then I'll have to edge it out with a similar
program but instead calling the command I, as I takes up less space on the
line than C.

Another alternative is to code nothing at all. The program is null, and so
is the output. :-)

Dave Kahn, ABB Steward Ltd.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.