Tim McCarthy <TimM@softwarejungle.com> wrote:

>Basing the QSYSINC structures? That would be useful.

Maybe IBM should provide two versions of each structure - one based and one not.
On the other hand it shouldn't be too hard to run up a program to copy the
QSYSINC members automatically creating based versions of all data structures.
Including from QSYSINC would give you the vanilla version, and from the copy
you'd have the home grown bells and whistles. After an upgrade you would simply
have to re-run one program.

Dave Kahn, ABB Steward Ltd.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.