RE: DSPOBJD and ODOBSZ - was DASD-DISKTASKS

["Kahn, David [JNJFR]" <DKahn1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Debbie,

Yes, thanks for pointing that out. I honestly had never considered the size
limitation. It doesn't seem so long ago that an AS/400 with 10 gig of DASD
would be considered large. Now my home PC has that much and the AS/400 has
single objects larger than that. :-o

I do wonder why IBM decided on a packed field of length 10. 11 digits would
take the same 6 bytes in the buffer but allow for objects up to 100 gig. 

Dave Kahn
Johnson & Johnson International (Ethicon) France
Phone : +33 1 55 00 3180
Email :  dkahn1@jnjfr.jnj.com (work)
           dkahn@cix.co.uk      (home)


-----Message d'origine-----
De: dgallagher@deloitte.ca [mailto:dgallagher@deloitte.ca]
Date: 09 September 1999 03:05
À: midrange-l@midrange.com
Objet: DSPOBJD and ODOBSZ - was DASD-DISKTASKS


Dave:

The outfile from DSPOBJD does have a field ODOBSZ, which used to be always
the
object size, but it is defined as a 10.0 field, so it does not correctly
report
objects that are 10 gigabytes or more. 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---