RE: [Feb 29, 2000] (feb 29, 1600)

[Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As I recall, we hadn't adopted the Gregorian calendar then.  I'm a little
fuzzy, but I think the rules were different.  I know the holidays were.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schenck, Don [mailto:Don.Schenck@WL.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 11:39 AM
> To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: [Feb 29, 2000]
> 
> 
> Funny ... I don't REMEMBER 1600 being a leap year ...
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan [mailto:dantanabanana@netscape.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 1:47 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: [Feb 29, 2000]
> 
> 
> Joe,
> 
> Almost.  2000 _is_ a leap year.  1600 was a leap year.  1700, 
> 1800, 1900
> were
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---