Re: [Feb 29, 2000]

["R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr." <rbruceh@xxxxxxx>]

"Schenck, Don" wrote:
> 
> Funny ... I don't REMEMBER 1600 being a leap year ...
> 

No, it wasn't. But they didn't use leap seconds then either.  ;-)

The Gregorian calendar had just been introduced that century(!?!? or was
it the one before?)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan [mailto:dantanabanana@netscape.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 1:47 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: [Feb 29, 2000]
> 
> Joe,
> 
> Almost.  2000 _is_ a leap year.  1600 was a leap year.  1700, 1800, 1900
> were
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---

-- 
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional System Administrator
 -- IBM Certified AS/400 Professional Network Administrator

"The sum of all human knowledge is a fixed constant.
    It's the population that keeps growing!"
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---