Re: 1600 - ,missing days - was Feb 29, 2000

[John P Carr <jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>"Schenck, Don" wrote: 
>> Funny ... I don't REMEMBER 1600 being a leap year ...

>No, it wasn't. But they didn't use leap seconds then either.  ;-)
>The Gregorian calendar had just been introduced that century(!?!? or was
>it the one before?)

Remember that in 173x (close to there)   we lost 3 or 4 days when they
corrected
the calandar.   See if that those missing days are a valid *ISO  date.
They shouldn't
be because they never happened.

John Carr

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---