|
Glenn: Don & Janet are just about ready to start the CONSULT400 mailing list. Keep an eye out for the annoucement. david At 08:56 AM 11/22/99 , Glenn Ericson wrote: >Booth >I tend to agree this would be a worthy addition to the midrange family >of lists. > >David what is the consensus so far? > >At 09:26 PM 11/21/99 -0500, you wrote: > >I agree that there is need for a forum for discussions. > > > >I just had a situation where I found a COBOL guy to help an organization > >that was in trouble and had given up entirely on ever finishing the > >project, let alone finishing it on deadline. We finished the project with > >nearly a half day to spare and sent an invoice and heard nothing. One > >phone call to follow up was all that was needed to realize that we weren't > >supposed to be successful with the project; we'd been hired to fail and > >prove the need for big-budget changes in the affected department. (That is > >a conclusion I drew, not provable anywhere). As a result the department > >manager discounted our invoice by 2/3rds. > > > >So, has anyone had this sort of thing happen? What do you do? Are > >lawyers worth the trouble? > > > >I wish there was a forum where a discussion of this topic would be > >on-topic. > > > > > >_______________________ > >Booth Martin > >boothm@earth.goddard.edu > >http://www.spy.net/~booth > >_______________________ > > > > > > > > > >Mark Lazarus <mlazarus@ttec.com> > >Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com > >11/20/1999 05:12 PM > >Please respond to MIDRANGE-L > > > > > > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > > cc: > > Subject: Re: *** ADMIN: Consultants forum? > > > >Larry, James, et al, > > > >At 12:00 AM 11/14/99 -0500, you wrote: > >>I too am one of us and find myself agreeing with James. We certainly > >wouldn't be > >>looking for clients there because, well, their wouldn't be any! I just > >can't > >>imagine what we would 'talk' about that can't be covered here on > >Midrange-L. > > > >>> IMHO, as a consultant, I'm hard pressed to find value in such a list. > > > >>> Now I could be very wrong, but I imagine the first round of postings > >>> would be a series of chest pounding to gain position by bragging > >>> rights. After that, no one would divulge their perceived competitive > >>> edge. > > > > Here's my opinion on this. I think that it can be a useful forum. This > >would be especially true for the little guy (i.e. a 1 man consulting > >shop.) > > > > Some possible topics: > > > >- Subcontracting > >- Rates for a service for a particular area > >- Contract samples > > > > IMHO, it should be allowed to post opportunities and consultants seeking > >work. > > > > -mark > >+--- > > -- | Internet: david@midrange.com | WWW: http://www.midrange.com/david | | This message was written and delivered using 100% | post-consumer (recycled) data bits. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.