Michele Reinkemeyer wrote:
>Booth Martin,
>Thanks so much for the offer of help. We are Y2K compliant as far as we can
>tell. The testers have tested, the Y2K ptfs are applied, etc. We were just all
>sitting around today and someone happened to ask if anyone had noticed if the
>date was a 4 digit date after the new year or not. None of us knew. I was
>hoping someone out there might know off the top of their head, but it's not a
>critical issue. Whether its 4 digits or just 2, I figure life will go on. I
>know on PCs, it's 4 digits for the most part, but was just curious what it was
>on the AS400. I guess I'll find out on the 1st of Jan 2000.
>
>Thanks!
>Michele R
>+---
Michele
That is a good question for the people that tested your system. Also you might want to inquire as to how the differences[ if any] in date formats between your PCs and the AS/400 are handled.
You should know this for the future.
One other question.
Was there anyone form your firms staff involved in the testing and acceptance processes?
Contingency Planning?
+--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.