RE: FW: Random

["Fisher, Don" <DRF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As someone observed earlier, that is not particularly intuitive.  The "For"
construct is, in my opinion, more logical in construction, mostly because it
is not limited to columnar formatting as is the "DO".

That is not to say the contruction is perfect.  The COBOL "Perform"
operation is probably more intuitive, but also more wordy.  That's not a
problem for me, but apparently, it is to some.

The "For" construct offers a good compromise between the RPG DO and the
COBOL "Perform" and has the advantage of high recognition among IS
professionals.

Just my opinion, of course.

Donald R. Fisher, III
Project Manager
Heilig-Meyers Furniture Company
(804) 784-7500 ext. 2124
Don.Fisher@HeiligMeyers.com

<Clip>

1 do 10 x
some code here
2  enddo

this will start with x = 1 and increment by 2.
<clip>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---