• Subject: Re: Microsoft (Re: DDS Support)
  • From: jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:46:56 -0400



>As I understand it, Microsoft moved off their 23 AS/400 to 1600 NT
servers,
>and only lasted on NT for a short period of time.  They then outsourced
>their IT to another company that just happens to have 23 AS/400's!
>Al

I corresponded with a person that works for a service bureau in Atlanta
that uses AS/400's and their customer was MS.

Also,
I did a class in Seattle and was talking to one of the students and he used
to work for MS,   He worked on the Conversion from AS/400's to NT(DB2/400
to SQL Server).   MS wanted to put some DB constraints in their DB(either
referential or check constraints) and when trying apply them during the
"Sync-up" phase,  it ran for 3 days trying just to get a sync point.   They
had to stop, NT couldn't catch up to get a valid sync point.  They gave up
trying to apply the constraint.   The AS/400 didn't have any problem with
the volume of the data, but with NT SQL server they have to run without
constraints!


John Carr

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.