| 
 | 
| Why do 
you say it will work much better than a twinax attached dumb 
terminal? I 
currently only have twinax running to this area.  Also, I don't 
particularly want a PC based reader - I've never used them and I want to have 
the scanned information available to the AS/400 session.  Wouldn't I be 
introducing more variables & points of failure by going the 
Netstation route? Dave 
 | 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.