|
"See this article by Don Rima. Please note that Don wrote this on his own, > and I had nothing to do with it's creation. This is not to imply that I > disagree with him. > > http://www.wash-midrange.org/StateoftheMidrange.htm This is powerful stuff and it needs to be said, even if, in the process, it may not have done much good to the confidence of some AS/400 users who were listening. I remember thinking when, in 1988, IBM launched the AS/400, "with this IBM will conquer the world". I know that that was not the last time that I was totally wrong, but it is entirely IBM's fault (the Corporation - not Rochester) that they did not conquer. Despite the vast numbers of NT & other boxes out there today (and there was no NT, etc. in 1988), IBM could still conquer the world although it would be dramatically more difficult today than in 1988. Basically they have the product to do it - it may need a few features. It certainly needs to be much more competitive at the lower end of the market. This is a problem that IBM could solve in an instant if they wished. How many "AS/400 thinkpads" such as Frank Soltis has mentioned would they sell - more than the total installed base of AS/400's today? It wouldn't surprise me. Such a machine would spread the word about the AS/400 - it would not need high level budget approval for purchase and people who are not used to the AS/400 could learn and show their bosses what it could do. So often IBM has good ideas and then, in my view, screws them up. For instance why on the new machines do you have to pay a fortune to continue using your old 5250's ? IBM seems to be so concerned about not "giving away" something. The result will surely be that users who want 5250 will hang on as long as they can to their existing boxes. Surely this stupidity is a serious inhibitor to people upgrading. They will resent IBM charging them a lot more to continue to use the terminals that IBM sold them in the past. MS must love it - IBM saying that the cheapest way to use your AS/400 is to use a PC with a MS OS on it. The trouble is that in exchanges like this on this and other forums, we are all preaching to the converted. Don's broadside may reach some of the right people in IBM (Al has forwarded it), but will one person's view change anything? I doubt it. Will changing the name of the AS/400 if it happens change anything? I doubt it. If IBM cannot tell the world what a superb platform the AS/400 is, how will they be able to tell the world that the I/500 (or whatever) is a superb platform? These exchanges on this and other lists are amusing but they are time consuming and I don't believe that they change anything. Perhaps we should take some action - all write to Lou direct or even better all subscribers to this and other lists should turn up at an agreed time at Lou's office with the media in tow. That would increase the number of people who had heard of the AS/400 if nothing else. I have no influence or contact with IBM. But others on this list do. Can they put themselves forward and act as our spokespersons (if they are willing) and go as a delegation on our behalf to see top level IBM management (Lou if possible)? Even those of us who are AS/400 bigots may feel that if IBM continually works against the interests of our employers (and so against our own interests as AS/400 people) we may get to the stage where we feel obliged to recommend to our employers that they drop the AS/400. Since IBM seems to make few new sales, the AS/400 would then die. Which of us wants to be working for the last company to scrap its AS/400 (or I/500)? Rob Dixon ________________________________________________________ Erros plc 44 (0) 1844 239 339 http://www.erros.co.uk - The AS/400 Neural Database for the Internet _________________________________________________________ +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.