|
Booth, The telnet tool you are talking about is the Microsoft telnet client. This client does not negotiate a terminal type when the remote host is an AS/400. This generates a VT100 ascii signon for an AS/400. The named devices support is part of the tn5250e RFC. This is fully supported on an AS/400 in a 5250 session. ISPs usually do not run a telnet server. There could be some security holes since a Windows NT has a default profile of Guest that anyone could use to signon a telnet session, signon as guest and destroy data in Windows NT. The AS/400 has user profiles with plenty of object level security to prevent someone from getting to data only if they are authorized. Richard G. Hartmann e-mail: rgh@us.ibm.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 16:00:06 -0600 From: "Richard Jackson" <richardjackson@richardjackson.net> Subject: RE: Telnet tool shutdown? Worse than a 3 hour delay is when I receive two or three replies to a message that I don't get for 2 or 3 hours - the replies arrive well before the original. Richard Jackson mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net http://www.richardjacksonltd.com Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058 Fax: 1 (303) 663-4325 |-----Original Message----- |From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com |[mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Peter Dow |Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 12:56 PM |To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com |Subject: Telnet tool shutdown? | | |Hi Booth, | |Blind eye and deaf ears. Haven't heard a thing. What do you mean "shutting |down the telnet tool"? ISP's refusing port 23 connections? That would be a |serious problem since I use TN5250 to connect to my customers. |What have you |heard? Or read? Or experienced? | |Regards, | |Peter Dow |Dow Software Services, Inc. |909 425-0194 voice |909 425-0196 fax | |P.S. I notice about a 3 hour time lag between when messages are posted and |when I receive them. I already mentioned it to David, but I was |wondering if |anyone else has shorter lags. | | |From: <booth@martinvt.com> | Even worse than all this energy and money being spent on some mystical | naming schema is their apparently blind eye to what is happening with | Microsoft. Has anyone else had complaints or seen evidence of Microsoft | shutting down the telnet tool? I've seen at least two mentions of | Internet Service Providers disabling telnet because it is too big a | security exposure. Further questions have been answered with "everybody | uses Windows so no one needs telnet anymore." | | I've wondered why the Windows telnet program has always been so ugly and | now I guess the answer is out. But, where will that leave TN5250? +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.