|
I agree that punching a button is easier and quicker than reaching for the mouse, that is why I design my GUI applications using function key, tab key, standard windows navigation keys (hot keys) and whatever other shortcuts I can think of to keep my user's hands on the keyboard. I can't argue that 5250 green screen keying isn't faster on a well laid out program but a well laid out GUI can work nearly as fast. The only real loss, where keying is concerned, is the loss of the field+, field- and field exit keys. However, I haven't tried this but using key press routines, I'm pretty sure that I could emulate those keys if I needed to. Anyway, I don't want to get into a holy war of GUI versus green screen, but I do think that GUI can be friendly if it is designed well. Personally, I prefer 5250 because it is very low maintenance, as someone else has already stated. JMHO, Jack Mullins Sun Ergoline P.O. Box 2026 Jonesboro, AR 72402 http://www.sunergoline.com jackm@sundash.com 870.935.1130 x 109 Personally I think the old green screen is fine for most legacy applications. I can press a number faster than I can grab my mouse, move it to the tab, and double click. But then there are people who just HAVE to have that 'point and click' system. > -----Original Message----- > From: Urbanek, Marty [SMTP:Marty_Urbanek@stercomm.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:34 AM > To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' > Subject: Opinions please: GUI vs. 5250 > > What do you think about GUI (client/server, thick or thin client) > interfaces > to AS/400 (iSeries!) business applications versus traditional 5250 "green > screen"? Which do you prefer and why? From the user perspective? From the > support perspective? What is your reaction to "hybrid" applications which > use green screen for some functions and GUI for others? All opinions > appreciated. Thanks! > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to > MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.