• Subject: Re: Opinions please: GUI vs. 5250
  • From: "Jack Mullins" <jmullins@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:21:44 -0500
  • Organization: Sun Industries, Inc.

I agree that punching a button is easier and quicker than reaching for the
mouse, that is why I design my GUI applications using function key, tab key,
standard windows navigation keys (hot keys) and whatever other shortcuts I
can think of to keep my user's hands on the keyboard.  I can't argue that
5250 green screen keying isn't faster on a well laid out program but a well
laid out GUI can work nearly as fast.  The only real loss, where keying is
concerned, is the loss of the field+, field- and field exit keys.  However,
I haven't tried this but using key press routines, I'm pretty sure that I
could emulate those keys if I needed to.  Anyway, I don't want to get into a
holy war of GUI versus green screen, but I do think that GUI can be friendly
if it is designed well.  Personally, I prefer 5250 because it is very low
maintenance, as someone else has already stated.

JMHO,

Jack Mullins
Sun Ergoline
P.O. Box 2026
Jonesboro, AR 72402
http://www.sunergoline.com
jackm@sundash.com
870.935.1130 x 109



Personally I think the old green screen is fine for most legacy
applications. I can press a number faster than I can grab my mouse, move it
to the tab, and double click.

But then there are people who just HAVE to have that 'point and click'
system.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Urbanek, Marty [SMTP:Marty_Urbanek@stercomm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:34 AM
> To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: Opinions please: GUI vs. 5250
>
> What do you think about GUI (client/server, thick or thin client)
> interfaces
> to AS/400 (iSeries!) business applications versus traditional 5250 "green
> screen"? Which do you prefer and why? From the user perspective? From the
> support perspective? What is your reaction to "hybrid" applications which
> use green screen for some functions and GUI for others? All opinions
> appreciated. Thanks!
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.