Re: ADSM

[Quazy <quazy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, Don't do it!
We looked real hard into this a couple of months ago.

The performance is really bad.

A model 170 (2388) backing up to ADSM on a NT box can only do a little bit 
more than 11GB a hour on a 100Mb network, Also the smaller the box the 
worse the performance with ADSM. compared to native BRMS at around 40 to 
60GB at V4R4 and a even faster rate at V4R5 (I cant find the numbers on this)

I was told from Rochester that a save from a NT ADSM server to a AS400 
client would have 80% the performance of a save file save.


If you are already using BRMS there is no need to complicate things by 
adding another layer.  You cant do a restricted state save using ADSM, 
among other things.

ADSM works ok as a server on the AS/400 to backup other boxes, but not very 
well as a client.

If you need more info let me know.

Check these links out for more info


http://www.as400.ibm.com/service/brms/adsmperf.htm
http://www.as400.ibm.com/service/brms/adsmtips.htm
http://www.as400.ibm.com/service/brms/adsmtbls.htm
http://www.as400.ibm.com/service/brms/adsmfaq.htm

At 02:55 PM 10/26/00 +0200, you wrote:


>Hi Folks,
>
>I am using BRMS to backup up most of the production machines
>and know that it is possible to configure the BRMS as client
>to ADSM , We have ADSM on AIX .
>
>Any input is welcome .
>
>Thanks,
>Avi
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---