• Subject: Field type for Array index
  • From: Jon.Paris@xxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 20:47:04 -0500

 >> the only sensible way to define a work variable that's a binary field
(OPM RPG)...

I was referring to RPG IV since there is no point in defining a binary work
field in OPM RPG.  As I mentioned in my original note, in OPM RPG it is
probably _less_ efficient to use a binary field than using a packed field.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.