Re: IBM HTTP Server

[MEovino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

One of my coworkers found in some piece of documentation somewhere that the
Domino HTTP server and the IBM HTTP server will not behave if forced to
share port 80.

So we turned Domino's HTTP stack off completely (we're moving it to another
box).  The site definitely behaves better, but still slows down from time
to time.  We've noticed that, when looking at option 3 of NETSTAT, we'll
see an awful lot of connections to port 80 that sit in a timed wait for
about a minute after they're used.  Could this be our problem?

Mike E.









MEovino@ESTES-EXPRESS.COM@UUCPHOST.MCS.NET on 11/21/2000 12:36:09 PM

Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
                                                                            
                                                                            
                                                                            


                                                              
 Sent by: midrange-l-owner@UUCPHOST.MCS.NET                   
                                                              
 To:      MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com                             
                                                              
 cc:                                                          
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 Subject: IBM HTTP Server                                     
                                                              







It had been performing pretty nicely for me up until now.  The two specific
changes we've made recently are:

1.  Moving the server from port 8080 to port 80
2.  Turning BindSpecific on so it would bind to one IP address (on port
80), and binding our Domino HTTP server to another IP address (also on port
80)

It still works, but it's pretty slow at times.  If I look at the active
jobs for QHTTPSVR, they look like this (set mail reader to fixed width
fonts for this to make sense):

Opt  Subsystem/Job  User        Type  CPU %  Function        Status
     QHTTPSVR       QSYS        SBS      .0                   DEQW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCH      .2  PGM-QZHBHTTP     CNDW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW
       DEFAULT      QTMHHTTP    BCI      .0                   TIMW

That first job under QHTTPSVR is ALWAYS in CNDW.  I don't remember if this
used to be the case before the changes.  CPU utilization on the box is
greatly DECREASED after the changes (generally around 20%), so I don't
think it's that.

Anyone have any ideas?

Mike E.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---