Re: % temp addresses climbing

[Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

NO PROBLEM. At 100 times that I wouldn't have a problem with it
(although I would be curious how big your system was at that point!) It
is very typical for machines that I work with to have %Temp addresses
10-20 times higher than %Perm addresses.

 - Larry

Alan Cassidy wrote:
> 
> Thanks Rob,
> 
> It is a RISC machine, S20, at V4R3. "% temp addresses" now stands at (.163).
> BTW, the "%perm addresses" value is at (.010).
> 
> But even if that figure is nowhere near bad, it makes me a little queasy
> that it keeps going up. Maybe that's a carryover from CISC days and previous
> machines. But... And I'm not clear on the concept of what it is..
> 
> - Alan Cassidy

-- 
Larry Bolhuis           | Cogito ergo mercari iSeries 
Arbor Solutions, Inc.   |
(616) 451-2500          |               (I think, therefore I buy iSeries.)
(616) 451-2571 -fax     |
lbolhuis@arbsol.com     |        #3  1951-2001
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---