|
|
the expression, I believe, is "You'd complain if you didn't get hung with a new rope." The point being...focus on important stuff, let the trivia go, To all the self appointed kings of the
list:
The monday after the upgrade there were
problems. crtdspf was returning an MCH type error, license keys were
invalid, users were having to respond to msgs saying "the grace period for
the use of their printer would expire soon".
Before the cause of the problems was
identified, there was valid, non trivial concern that the ptf load, which the
ibm document stated would take a minimum of 4 hrs had only taken 50 minutes.
Something might have been missed, maybe we had received an incorrect cume,
...
The question, posed to the list leaders
and everyone else was to ask what ibm bases its estimates on.
Now the kings make important contributions
to the list. I have learned from their responses. I wish them well, maybe
a larger cubicle. Let them be assured that their role as list leaders will not
be challenged.
_______________________
I bet you'd complain if you got hung with a brand new rope! Be happy. Find a real problem. Spend some quality time with a pretty friend. (Some people may not get the first line. That's okay - I never did either.) Rob Berendt ================== Remember the Cole! "Steve Richter" <srichter@AutoCoder To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> .com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: why cum ptf apply faster than predicted? owner-midrange-l@mi drange.com 05/15/01 09:58 PM Please respond to MIDRANGE-L >There are some situations where loading and applying PTF's can take longer - >particular if you need certain prerequisites, if some PTF's are applied they >need to be unapplied before the new ones go on, it depends how many are >superseded, what group PTF's you have installed etc. etc. > good explanation of the reason for the high side estimate. But the low side estimate still remains questionable. The cover letter said 4 to 8 hours. Is the 4 and 8 hour figure the value for the best and worse case scenario on a baseline system? ex: 4 hrs if loading cume on top of a new release on a 520, 8 hrs if loading on top of a prev cume on the same 520? Steve +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- |
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
