RE: Hypothetical

["jt" <jt@xxxxxx>]

Ken,

IMHO, the best line of technology to pursue would be whatever follow-on
product IBM offers.  I don't believe they will abandon a lucrative market.
The only question is whether the follow-on will get the advantage of
sufficient funding (for marketing and R & D to keep up with new
technologies) or whether it will stagnate and be in the same class as the
S/36 product line is today.

Is the question: what if the IBM midrange doesn't get funding to keep up,
and your business has IT needs the 400 can't supply, then what should you
do?  If this is the question (and some would say this is, in fact, the
current situation) then I'd say you should look at the specific business
need, and go with the platform that provides the best solution for that
need.

If the 400 goes by the wayside (technologically speaking) then IMHO nobody
will have a good option to concentrate on one particular platform.  If that
happens, I think you'll be forced to go the "mix-and-match" approach, which
many in the industry seem content to follow these days.

jt



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of ken shields
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 7:14 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L
Subject: Hypothetical


Gentlemen/women
        Assuming for a moment, that the IBM midrange line of computers
encountered an untimely demise, what in your estimation would be next best
line of technology to persue?
        There is method to my madness.
Thanks
--
Best Regards
Ken Shields


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---