|
Chris, > >For years (two decades now!) Microsoft has been able to push a new product >into the market by simply bundling it with their operating system and >displacing the existing market leaders. How do you explain the success of ms office? It is not bundled with the os, ms charges a premium for it, and yet it outsells all of its competitors. In regard to access to api's ... 1. After reading the Andrew Shulman books on windows internals, I dont see why the techniques he uses to disassemble the api calls could not have been used by lotus and wp. 2. Did big users of windows, like say citibank, not get the correct api documentation either? I doubt it. And I also doubt that the developers at lotus and wp were fooled. I think only their lawyers say so. 3. all the windows api's are calls to functions in dll's. Lotus and wp could have written their own versions of the api's that they suspected of being bogus. No? 4. Lotus and WordPerfect had plenty of dos profits to spend on writing their own api's if they really thought that ms was not giving them the details. But they chose to pocket their dos profits while ms reinvested theirs in windows. Not an ms appologist, Steve Richter +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.