|
Thanks, Leif. I always enjoy these little discussions <laughing>. I'll look into it when I get a chance - the subject is sure to come up as I start rolling out my toolbox onto production sites. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:24 AM > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > Subject: Re: IIS to as/400 odbc > > > From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> > > > Leif, I agree with you 100%. > > A proprietary protocol is a good additional security > > measure. Certainly better than straight ODBC access. > > anything is better than ODBC :-) > > > > > Do you agree or disagree with that statement? > > obviously agree > > > > > Encrypted communication between DMZ and production machines would be the > > next level, and using it would depend on the sensitivity of > your data, the > > level of perceived threat, and the expense you're willing to > shoulder. How > > easy is it to implement a triple-DES connection between two > machines? How > > expensive? > > Triple DES is fairly expensive. AES is cheap, very fast (almost as fast as > simple > disk I/O - see Chapter 30 of 'you-know-what').
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.