|
Dan,
You have mistakenly combined two different threads. Nobody was
contesting IBM's number of patents or their status as a filer.
Bale, Dan wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>--
>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>Good grief, enough of the pissing wars already!
>
>FWIW, one or more of the AS/400 trade rag email newsletters reports this
>every year. IBM has received more patents than any other entity.
>
>
>Can we please end this particular "patent" thread? Please.
>
>Dan Bale
>IT - AS/400
>Handleman Company
>248-362-4400 Ext. 4952
>D.Bale@Handleman.com
> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
>
--
Chris Rehm
javadisciple@earthlink.net
If you believe that the best technology wins the
marketplace, you haven't been paying attention.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.