|
I remember reading through the PTF notes and found something like: If you have a negative 7.4 variable and divide it by a positive 9.3 variable and the result is a 5.5 variable, unpredictable results would occur. And I remember thinking "Who the heck found this one!" The last time I reported a bug that I could consistantly recreate and document was at V2R1 on a B30. I guess staying a little bit further from the edge amounts to a little less bleeding. :) Buck Calabro wrote: > > Some of this is because the client is back-level on OS/400 or on PTFs, but > some of it is because it's an IBM bug that takes precise circumstances to > materialise.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.