On Tue, 16 October 2001, "Nathan M. Andelin" wrote:

> No.  My intent was not to develop a message transport mechanism.  In message
> transport, my understanding is that a public key is used to authenticate the
> sender and a private key is used to decipher the message.
>
> My API was intended to encrypt and decipher data locally.

Seems like a very limited market if transport isn't an issue. Reasonable 
authority settings should be otherwise effective, unless encryption is intended 
to block high-authority users. But a high-authority user quite possibly can 
intercept any key when it's entered... unless you've implemented some means 
that protects the key as it passes between the user and the algorithm.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.