Model 270 VS 250 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Model 270 VS 250
From: Steve Moland <Steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:32:07 -0500
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

We recently looked at identically configured models 250s and 270s and the
250s were slightly higher in the combined price of hardware and software.
The 250 maintenance was also slightly higher.

The 270 has twice the performance numbers of the 250, so does anyone know
why anyone would opted for a 250. Why do they exist at all.

Steve Moland
Access Paths Inc
--

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Model 270 VS 250 , Andy Nolen-Parkhouse
Re: Model 270 VS 250 , Pat Barber

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.