Brad,

>1.  Besides the fact that it's the "norm", what reasons are
>given for the need to price software on a tierred level?

To make it affordable to a wider range of customers.  If priced uniformly, the
averaged cost would be cost prohibitive for the small guy.

>2.  Does the software for a larger machine require more
>coding, support etc. to make up for the difference?

Depends on the product, but it is not unreasonable to expect more support issues
with 1000 concurrent users than with 10.

>3.  What other industries tier their pricing for the SAME
>product?  (ie gas costs the same for a ferrari and a tempo).

Try government taxation. :)  If the business makes more money, Uncle Scam wants
a bigger share.  Same with King Louie.

BTW, gas *does* cost more for my Northstar engine than for a Ford Tempo...

Doug



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.