>I don't really want to speak for Brad Stone or Bob Cancilla,
>but I think that our approaches teach and simplify Web
>development for new applications.

Agreed.  That helps anchor my point that there isn't a "magic" way to
"convert" EXFMT into a GUI API call.  Such work really needs to be designed
in, rather than bolted on.

>My goal was to make it as easy to
>build a Web application as a 5250 application.
>Not to extend existing applications.

My point was poorly made.  I named you folks as examples of different
methods to Webify.  I should have made that clear.  WebFacing, CGI,
Net.Data, PSC/400 and Relational-Web all serve different needs and that was
my point - there's no single solution that'll serve the needs of re-facing,
re-vitalising and new development (although this market tends to try to bend
everything into a generic solution.)
  --buck


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.