|
Tom wrote: >> > Of course it looks as though it's dead in the water as a >> > CFINT killer as Leif tells us the 5250 bit is still set. >> >> What on earth made people think otherwise ? > > Thank you and amen. It was just a silly demo to answer a specific question. Exactly. I didn't expect it to be that easy. I was most curious to see whether the job type would switch from BCH to INT while it was using the acquired terminal. It doesn't. Now the question arises: should a job shown as batch by the system be counted in the interactive CPW? Arguably not, so where is that paid for capacity? Dave... "...and then the different branches of Arithmetic - Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision." - Lewis Carroll. ======================================================= The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
