|
jt wrote: > The advantages to the methodology are PERCEIVED to hinge on giving code > away. But the advantages DO NOT DIRECTLY DEPEND on giving code away for > free. I thought the main advantages were peer review and unrestricted development. These depend absolutely on giving code away for free. > WyattERP, if successful, could kill AccountMates. So? Another low budget, but not free, ERP could do likewise. That's the nature of competition. Would you prefer price fixing? > You can always hope that AccountMates will change their business model, > to give their software away and just sell support... That would also level > the playing field, but I don't see that happening, anytime soon. Then in a swift volte-face you don't see WyattERP as a serious threat to AccountMates? Of course they would consider changing their business model if it were the only way to avoid going under. > If you object strongly to the idea of turning WyattERP into a for-profit > venture, consider charging for it and donating all the proceeds to the > iNation. ROFL Dave... "String is a very good thing. Rope is thicker, but string is quicker!" - Spike Milligan ======================================================= The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.