On Wed, 21 November 2001, "Hall, Philip" wrote:

> > Why unethical? And what grounds for suit? Code breaks
> > often happen after PTFs. (Review the history of v4r3 DB group PTFs.)
>
> Yeah, but they (IBM) are unlikely for this PTF to turn around and say
> 'Ooops, here's another PTF to try and fix what we just broke..' are they now
> ?

They probably would if you could demonstrate that they broke code relying on 
documented interfaces. But I suspect the fixing PTFs wouldn't reenable Fast400.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.