RE: "One person per product" -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: "One person per product"
From: "Schenck, Don" <Don.Schenck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:01:44 -0500
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't see this stuff as being that difficult:

1. Define requirements.
2. Assign ownership.
3. Trust.


Use Cases and UML go a LONG WAY toward solving #1.

Your story is great; it illustrates:

No defined requirements.
No single point of ownership.
No trust.


-- Don

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: "One person per product" , jt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.