RE: Efficacy of code generators (was RE: Two persons per product") -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Efficacy of code generators (was RE: Two persons per product")
From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:41:13 -0500
Importance: Normal
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Sure.. Nathan?


| -----Original Message-----
| From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
| [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Damato
| Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:28 PM
| To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
| Subject: RE: Efficacy of code generators (was RE: Two persons per
| product")
|
|
| Let's change the list as well.  Could you move it to non-tech?
|

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.