|
On Sun, 16 December 2001, "John Earl" wrote: > However, the arguement that > "static" information has no need for security just doesn't make > sense. There is lot's of static information that is well > deserving of the best protection money can buy. My Social > Security number, the Coca Cola formula, Sate Farm's actuarial > algorithms, etc. etc. Just because data does not normally change > doen't mean it should be left unsecured. And, of course, simple defacement of "static" HTML documents can cause significant trouble. Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
