Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows)
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:30:38 -0700 (MST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Scott Klement wrote:

> IMHO, when Netserver is working properly and at it's best, it's about 1/3
> the speed of accessing a share on an NT box.   (Of course, my only
> experience is with my own model 270... which is very fast for other
> things, and not loaded down much at all)

Does anyone have any experience with iSeries' NFS performance?  I set it
up once a long time ago before our machine was connected to the internet.
But we didn't really use it much.  Anyone using NFS seriously?

James Rich
james@eaerich.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Samba (was: OS-X vs. Windows) , Martin Rowe

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.