Re: Teraspace memory allocation -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Teraspace memory allocation
From: David & Eileen Keck <bstars@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:11:28 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I beg to differ.  As I suggested in a previous post on this topic, a
Teraspace Server process could be set up as a daemon.  From a design point
of view, mutiple jobs can certainly share the same teraspace by referencing
the same handle / cookie.
Dave K.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Coulter" <shc@flybynight.com.au>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: Teraspace memory allocation

----snip ----------
>  TS exists only
> for the duration of a job/process thus a handle cannot be stored
externally
> to the process and reused in a different process.
----snip-----------

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.