RE: code optimization was: Trivia: Processor MHz -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: code optimization was: Trivia: Processor MHz
From: "John Taylor" <jtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 10:41:33 -0700
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Simon,


>
> Not really wanting to enter this pointless debate but ...
>

As I mentioned in an earlier post, my point is that it's meaningless to say
that server X can only handle N users, because that doesn't take into
account the specific workloads. I really didn't think that I'd be required
to start collecting performance statistics in order to support that rather
obvious position. :)

Have a happy New Year!


John Taylor

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Defining CL Compile Options , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.