1)  You're right about the thoroughness of the testing.  Keeping it simple
with a sending out of an email and a return is probably the best.
2)  If I was to write my own I would probably want to tap into their
presence because using scripts to talk to my own site would probably all
happen internally - who knows what evil those router people have been up
to.
3)  I didn't think that the VPN might not be a true test - do you think
that it, again, might be manipulated by the Cisco kid?  If so, then maybe
two accounts at home might be in order.  A separate cable modem account for
the truly outside - and a VPN/DSL account for the inside.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin



                    Scott Klement
                    <klemscot@klements.       To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
                    com>                      cc:
                    Sent by:                  Fax to:
                    midrange-l-admin@mi       Subject:     Re: Testing email 
connection to the outside world
                    drange.com


                    12/31/2001 04:27 PM
                    Please respond to
                    midrange-l







Comments in-line.

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 rob@dekko.com wrote:
>
> We thought of bouncing it off of yahoo or hotmail but the turnaround is
> unacceptable.  Yahoo has an out of office but I am not sure how often it
> grinds out the out-of-office message.  Yahoo also has a forwarding to
> another address which sounds really cool but that only pumps it out on
> occasion and not upon the receipt of new mail.
>

This would be a good test, but as you've noticed, the turnaround isn't
so hot.

> Our Cisco kid have me this url to verify our email, but I don't know how
to
> utilize this information programmatically:
> http://www.zmailer.org/mxverify-cgi.html

That's nice.  I can show you how to do that programmatically -- but
it doesn't test everything.   It tests that the MX hosts that your ISP
has set up for you are receiving mail.  It does not eliminate any bugs
in those mail servers that might prevent the mail from actually getting
to you.  (Though, if you wrote your own version of these scripts, you
could have it create an actual message that gets sent to you, which
would be a more thorough test.)  Plus, it doesn't test outgoing mail at
all.

If you do want to do this programmatically, you'll need to make a choice:

   1) Do you want to call the existing mxverify-cgi scripts at zmailer.org
        and/or funet.fi.  (Presumably, they wouldn't mind you doing this?)

   2) Do you want to write a program that does the same thing that these
        scripts are doing, and run it from your AS/400?

Option #1 would be very easy using my new open-source "HTTP API".  (Which
allows you to communicate with web servers, cgi scripts, etc from an ILE
program, using GET or POST methods, and with & without SSL)  If that
interests you, take a look at:
    http://klement.dstorm.net/httpapi/

and let me know and I'll post a quick example of making such a query.  (I
wrote one in about 3 minutes, just to see if it would work)

For #2, you'd want to:
   1) Get the DNS MX records of your mail servers.  I posted an example of
         this here:
         http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200110/msg01567.html
   2) Make TCP socket connections to each mail server and send the SMTP
         messages that look something like this:
              HELO whatever
              get back SMTP reply
              MAIL FROM:<>
              get back SMTP reply
              RCPT TO:<postmaster@that.domain>
              get back SMTP reply
              RCPT TO:<your.address@that.domain>
              get back SMTP reply

      For details on the sockets part, you can see my sockets tutorial
      at:   http://klement.dstorm.net/rpg/socktut/

      and for details on the SMTP protocol, see RFC 821

Or I could post a simple example of this, if this is indeed what you want
to do..

> Perhaps an option is to get DSL set up to my home and have a throwaway
box
> there configured with it's own email domain to bounce back messages.
Work
> has already supplied my home PC and is currently paying for my second
phone
> line.  Some other employees here have this DSL connection with a VPN.  We
> might be able to utilize them instead.

Even better would be a mail server that does not have any sort of VPN
connection to you that you could send a message to and have it mail back
a reply.,,

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.