Re: SQL Join of intermediate tables and failing ORDER BY

[darren@xxxxxxxxx]

Previously written:

>Of possible interest to you is that many history files contain cost
>information AT THE TIME of the transaction, while the cost master file
>contains cost information AS OF RIGHT NOW so what you appear to be doing
is
>looking at historical data & applying current costs to them, which I
consider
>to be potentially misleading.

That is correct.  This is an exception report so we're looking for, among
other things, items where the cost may vary for different facilities.

I believe I've found the culprit in the ORDER BY being ignored.  By slowly
eliminating criteria and re-running the query it appears that an exception
join with two like tables perhaps causes some kind of problem.  In my
opinion this should not occur since unique qualified fields are specified
from each join.  Even specifying a numeric sort field seems to be a futile
attempt.  The order in which the qualified fields are selected from the
exception join does however affect the sort order.  I'm still confused but
am able to make the statement perform as required.