|
Randy Mangham said; >I scanned about 500 of last year's patent titles for IBM. Yep, you're >right. Nothing really useful or unique. Just simple things any of us could >come up with in our spare time in the garage. Simple, useless things like: <SNIP> >Method for minimizing sample damage during the ablation of material using a >focused ultrashort pulsed beam (# 6333485) Randy Like, I just GOTTA see your garage man. I felt good just having a table saw. Just kidding(I know you were). Good post Randy. I agree with your bottom assesment of MS vs IBM's patents John Carr
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
