Re: Which OS is more secure ? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Which OS is more secure ?
From: jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:10:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>No, the philosophy is that there is a quicker time to find and fix those
>bugs, which leads to overall fewer bugs.
>Imagine the amount of bugs found in Windows if MS released source code.
>Adam Lang

I still think this idea is the best to handle that point

ONE FIRM TO MAKE SOFTWARE, OTHER TO MAKE PATCHES
http://www.satirewire.com/news/jan02/patchsoft.shtml

john

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.