Re: CPW Per User

[John Myers - MM <jmyersmm@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

There isn't really any guidelines for this ... it all comes down to the
software that you are using.  Some software packages have a relatively
short "code path" and require next to no CPW ... others execute a LOT of
code and are much more processor dependent.

That's why NO ONE can answer your question ... in the end, most software
vendors have their own "rules of thumb" that they use ... if the machine is
using a vendor software package, try to get guidance from that vendor.

Another issue is whether the software uses "interactive" or "machine" CPW
... THIS IS A VERY SIGNIFICANT ISSUE ... often a machine has 10 or more
times the total capacity than interactive.

This is one reason out of many that my company is writing all of our new
applications to be able to run without 5250 terminal function.  IBM made a
conscious decision to push users away from 5250 terminal functions and to
significantly tax those that chose to remain.

Unfortunately for IBM, this also tends to make the software somewhat
machine independent ... an unintended consequence!

I know that this didn't answer your question ... sorry ... but I hope that
it helps!

John Myers
IBM Certified Specialist - IBM iSeries Technical Solutions Design
IBM Certified Specialist - Advisor for e-Business
Strategic Business Systems, Inc.
17 S. Franklin Turnpike, Ramsey, NJ 07446  USA
E-mail: mailto:jmyers@sbsusa.com   Phone: +1 (201) EASY 400   x131
Web:    http://www.sbsusa.com      Fax:   +1 (201) 327-6984

Free Sports League Management - Powered by AS/400
      http://www.ScoreBook.com

Get and route intelligence from your IBM AS/400 web site - WebSurvey/400
      http://www.WebSurvey400.com

At 01:56 AM 3/5/2002, you wrote:
>It seems from the archives and IBM's site that CPW per user depends on many
>factors and is a wide range. Are there any general guidelines to follow for
>determining CPW needed based on the number of users?
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff