From: Joe Pluta


> Yes, my statement does confuse the two terms.  Perhaps because it's
> confusing, or perhaps because the terms are sort of inseparable.  If I
have
> an SQL program on OS-A and I want it to talk to DBMS-1, then I need driver
> OS-A/DBMS-1.  In order to run with DBMS-2, I need driver OS-A/DBMS-2.  To
> run on another platform, I need ALL the drivers for the various target
> databases for that platform.
>
> Am I starting to understand?

Based upon the post that I extracted your statement from, I think you
understand perfectly well. :-)  As you've already stated, ODBC drivers are
not portable across OS's. But that is not the same thing as saying that SQL
isn't portable.


Regards,

John Taylor







This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.