Re: Jobnumber 002901 instead of 461xxx

[Mike Buglass <mike.buglass@xxxxxxxxxx>]

oliver.wenzel@cibavision.novartis.com wrote in
81068C8DC326D211A16E4000DE020001027DF1EB@DEGWEXC01.cv.degw:">news:81068C8DC326D211A16E4000DE020001027DF1EB@DEGWEXC01.cv.degw:

> Hello,
>
> I just found something strange: We currently have job numbers
> around 400000 on our system. Now I saw a user
> with several print files with number 002901...
>
> The spoolfiles have been created today, other files of the same
> user have a correct job number..
>
> Any ideas how this can happen?
>
> Thanks ,
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> ....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7..
> ..+....8. ...+
> *
>      SFCA21PR    1882  QPRTJOB     ADELMJU1    002901  PRT504
>      QUSRSYS
> *
>      SFCA05PR    1881  QPRTJOB     ADELMJU1    002901  PRT504
>      QUSRSYS
> *
>
> Ende *
> *

Oliver,  the QPRTJOB jobs associated with a user hang around a long
time. Look at the print file numbers (1881, 1882). These are prints
that are not associated with a particular job - such as prints that
have been sent from another machine with SNDNETSPLF.





--
Mike Buglass